SeenewsSeenews
Search
Seenews
AlertsSeenewsSeenews
Searchclose
TOPICS
arrow
COUNTRIES
arrow
INDUSTRY
arrow
Economy
arrow
Browse Economy
Mix and match your focus countries with our advanced search
Investments
arrow
Browse Investments
Mix and match your focus countries with our advanced search
Deals
arrow
Browse Deals
Mix and match your focus countries with our advanced search
Tech
arrow
Browse Tech
Mix and match your focus countries with our advanced search
Green
arrow
Browse Green
Mix and match your focus countries with our advanced search
0/5
You have 5 free articles left this month
You have 0/5 free articles
Sign up to get 5 more free articles this month
SIGN UP
arrow
LOGIN
arrow

S&P affirms Slovenia at 'A-/A-2', outlook revised to stable

Dec 21, 2014, 8:57:36 PMArticle by Valentina Dimitrievska
share
December 21 (SeeNews) - Standard&Poor's Ratings Services said it has revised its outlook on Slovenia to stable from negative.

S&P affirms Slovenia at 'A-/A-2', outlook revised to stable

At the same time, Slovenia's 'A-/A-2' long- and short-term foreign and local currency sovereign credit ratings have been affirmed, the ratings agency said in a statement on Saturday.

S&P also said in a statement:

“RATIONALE

The outlook revision reflects our opinion that the election of the new coalition government has improved growth prospects and reduced policy uncertainty. The ratings on Slovenia reflect our view of its open and relatively wealthy economy. Although Slovenia tends to record weaker growth than its eurozone peers, it has outperformed our January and revised June economic forecasts,and its external performance remains strong.

These strengths are moderated, in our opinion, by the sharp increase in Slovenia's debt burden associated with the government rescue of its banks, and some residual political uncertainty regarding the new government's ability to implement structural reforms, strengthen the banking system, boost public finances, and enhance economic growth.

We consider that policy risks in Slovenia have receded since the Party of Miro Cerar (Stranka Mira Cerarja; SMC) won the July 13 election and formed a center-left coalition with the Democratic Party of Slovenian Pensioners (DeSUS) and the center-left Social Democrats (SD). The coalition has a comfortable parliamentary majority: it holds 52 out of 90 parliamentary seats.

In our view, entrenched political patronage and weak institutional and corporate governance, as well as nonparliamentary opposition such as from trade unions, could still restrict the pace and scope of budgetary, health care, labor, and state administration reforms, and hamper banking system resolution and the ongoing privatization process.

The new government has stated that its key priority is to prepare and adopt measures to balance public finances by 2019. It has introduced legislation that will embed a new balanced budget rule in the constitution. The National Reform Program 2013-2014 and Stability Program 2014 will remain policy anchors.

Slovenia has passed several of the milestones required to strengthen the stability of its banking system under the National Reform Program 2013-2014. These include establishing the Bank Asset Management Company (BAMC), transferring the bulk of the nonperforming claims to the BAMC, and injecting capital increases into distressed state-owned banks. It has also progressed toward its goal of selling 15 state-owned companies and has completed four sales (including FOTONA d.d., Helios d.d., and Aerodrom Ljubljana d.d.).

We estimate Slovenia's GDP per capita in 2014 at $23,700, and have revised our 2014-2016 average annual real GDP growth projections for Slovenia to 1.5% from 0.9%. This revision reflects the stronger performance of net exports (particularly of information and communications technology and electrical equipment) and rising civil engineering construction (mainly EU-funded municipal infrastructure projects).

Rising retail and wholesale trade, and professional and technical services (such as architectural and engineering services), also contributed to the improved growth outlook.

Despite Slovenia's recovery becoming broader, we consider that prospects for economic growth remain weak without further structural reforms. Given the high indebtedness of the corporate sector and the government's gradually reducing fiscal flexibility, we anticipate that economic prospects may remain subdued unless Slovenia further reduces its involvement in the economy.

We also consider that regulatory and judicial reforms could improve the investment environment--investing in Slovenia is currently slow and costly--and are also likely to improve Slovenia's growth prospects. This could lead to higher foreign or domestic direct investments, which Slovenia needs to reduce its external borrowings and support the economy's growth potential.

Although the economy benefits from its trade openness, in our view, significant administrative barriers still inhibit foreign direct investment (FDI). At the same time, we see the sustainability of economic recovery in its main trading partners as a key risk for Slovenia's growth prospects.

We expect a headline general government deficit of 6.8% of GDP in 2014 (3.4% of GDP without one-off expenditure to recapitalize banks and fund loan carve-out expenses associated with transferring nonperforming claims to the BAMC). The government's target is a fiscal deficit of 2.8% of GDP in 2015.

It intends to achieve this by limiting public sector wage rises, rationalizing general government transfers, and improved targeting of investment. It plans only minor revenue initiatives, such as raising taxes on financial services and insurances services, and increasing the efficiency of tax collection.

Reflecting the bank support costs, fiscal deficits, and significant prefunding of 2015 financing needs, we project the net general government debt to rise by about 23% of GDP over 2012–2014 to 71.9%. From 2015, we expect the pace of debt accumulation will slow markedly, reflecting lower fiscal deficits and an end to government support of banks. We expect the pace of debt accumulation to fall to 0.7% of GDP by 2017, after further fiscal consolidation.

We forecast gross general government debt (excluding the guarantees related to the European Financial Stability Facility) to rise by 13% to 83.4% in 2014 (partly reflecting a fiscal deficit of 6.8%). We forecast that it will peak at 83.7% of GDP in 2015 and decline to about 80% by 2017. As with the debt of all asset management companies ("bad banks"), our estimates of Slovenia's gross and net general government debt include BAMC-related obligations issued to purchase loans and other distressed assets from participating Slovenian banks at a discount to market value. These obligations amount to about €1.6 billion (4.6% of GDP). Although we consolidate this debt into general government debt, we do not consider BAMC's assets to be liquid, apart from cash and cash equivalents (currently negligible).

Should BAMC convert its loan assets into cash through foreclosure or sale more quickly than we expect, Slovenia's general government debt net of liquid assets could decline faster than we project. We do not include any future privatization proceeds in our forecasts. If these materialized, net general government debt could stabilize or decline.

A loss in competitiveness associated with a fall in labor productivity (by 2% since 2008), a strong rise in nominal unit labor costs (11% since 2008), a real effective exchange rate appreciation (2% since 2008), and a mild deterioration in Slovenia's terms of trade, have so far not undermined Slovenia's external performance.

The current account surplus rose to an estimated 5.5% of GDP in 2014 after a decade of deficits before 2010. We project that Slovenia's current account surpluses will average about 5.5% of GDP through 2017, due to improved export performance. Offsetting these flows, the income deficit continues to rise, reflecting higher dividend and interest payments on Slovenia's high external liabilities.

Slovenian banks and companies have been reducing their external borrowings in recent years. We anticipate that Slovenia's reliance on external savings to fund its growth could fall further as a result of increased FDI, including from the scheduled privatizations. Increased FDI would also likely strengthen Slovenia's competitive position. We anticipate narrow net external debt (the ratio of gross external debt less official reserves and financial sector external assets to current account receipts [CARs]) will average 59.5% over 2014-2017.

Although Slovenian banks and companies borrow at higher rates than comparable entities in northern eurozone states, we view Slovenian banks' access to the European Central Bank (ECB) as an important ratings factor. Although Slovenian banks' low rollover rate of external debt has seen them move into small external creditor positions in 2014, from net external debt of 30% of CARs in 2009, we understand that Slovenian banks have ample unencumbered collateral (including recent government injections of recap bonds) to access ECB facilities if needed.

Recapitalization costs remain broadly consistent with the estimates in our base-case scenario of the provisioning the banking system will need to maintain an adequate level of capital at the end of 2015. Any further asset quality deterioration in domestic, and particularly government-owned, banks increases the likelihood of further support from the Slovenian government, as well as contingent liabilities crystallizing on the sovereign balance sheet.

OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the new government will progress with fiscal consolidation, banking system restructuring, and implementation of structural reforms, including the privatization of state assets.

Our outlook also assumes that Slovenia's coalition government will stabilize net general government debt at about 70% of GDP in 2015.

We may lower the ratings if:

· Economic growth prospects weaken significantly, damaging the policy cohesiveness of the government coalition and reversing the budgetary consolidation;

· Policymaking becomes less predictable, for example due to economic policy deviations from the government's own program; or

· Net government debt rises to above 80% of GDP, either because of fiscal loosening or additional government support for the banking sector.

On the other hand, we may raise our ratings if the implementation of the government reform program results in substantially better growth and fiscal outturns than we currently project, such that net general government debt falls below 60% of GDP and net external debt continues to decline.”

Your complete guide to the emerging economies of Southeast Europe. From latest news to bespoke research – the big picture at the tip of your fingers.